We now know that the U.S. government began investigating Donald Trump in the Summer of 2016, months before he was elected.  There were FBI and CIA investigations into supposed collusion with Russia.  There was no collusion with Russia, so they had to get some help.  They found help in the completely false dossier that Hillary’s campaign paid Fusion GPS to hire Brit Christopher Steele to quote unnamed Russian intelligence officers, who made up a load of crap that nobody, including the FBI, ever bothered to try to corroborate.  That wouldn’t have been so bad had the Justice Dept. not used the dossier to get FISA warrants that permitted the Obama Justice Dept. to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign.  In hindsight, you can almost understand why the FBI and Obama’s Justice Dept. had to open an investigation on Trump.  They already were supposed to be investigating Hillary for her email server crimes, so fair’s fair, right?  All they were doing was employing liberal excuse Number Two.  An explanation is in order.  Whenever a liberal imbecile is confronted with an uncomfortable fact, he or she gives one of two excuses – either “That’s not true,” or “Both sides do it.”  Ergo, if Hillary was a criminal under FBI investigation, it was only fair to investigate Trump too.  And investigate they did.  The CIA and FBI looked for Russian collusion.  They didn’t find any, because there was none.  So then, Trump was elected, and James Comey decided to become a double agent.  He met with the President, and instead of playing the role of FBI Director meeting his boss, he became Special Agent Comey, meeting with a suspected criminal.  Comey took copious notes that he transcribed, and then illegally took with him after he was fired by Donald Trump.  Part of the notes detailed the President’s discussion of the investigation of Michael Flynn, during which Trump supposedly said Flynn was a good man, and that he hoped Comey could see his way clear to let the matter go.  When Comey testified to Congress in June 2017, he swore that he did not get the impression that he was being ordered to drop the investigation.  After Comey was fired, he changed his mind about that.  Comey’s firing had that effect on a lot of Democrats.  Before Comey was fired, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and other Democrat elected officials called for Comey to be fired, including one Gerald Nadler, the current Chairman of the House Oversight Committee.  For two years, the Dems have been responding to the musical question, “What evidence is there to prove Trump colluded with Russia?” by parroting, “We have to wait for the Mueller report.  Mueller was appointed after Comey was fired to try to maintain the coverup of the FBI and Justice Dept. wrongdoing in the Trump campaign.   By all accounts, Mueller is about done with Witch Hunt 1.0, which has turned up no evidence of collusion by Trump.  Enter Nadler, who has changed the narrative to obstruction of justice, which is as improbable as the collusion narrative.  Nadler has, so far, subpoenaed 81 people, including Trump lawyers, in an attempt to find evidence that former FBI Director, former U.S. Attorney, super-lawyer Robert Mueller, and his team of 17 additional Trump-hating super-lawyers were unable to find, which is not surprising, because it doesn’t exist.  There are major problems with the obstruction of justice claim.  Chief among them is that obstruction of justice does not exist in a vacuum.  In other words, you cannot obstruct justice until or unless there is some underlying crime that you are trying to cover up.  The problem with the whole Trump Witch Hunt is that there never was a crime to investigate.  Following the investigative philosophy of Josef Stalin and Lavrenti Beria’s NKVD, “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime,” the now more than three years of multiple investigations have been a search for a crime, any crime.  In Trump’s case, there is no underlying crime.  A president can’t obstruct justice by simply exercising his Article II executive powers.  Even Comey agreed with that.  That’s all Comey’s firing was.  A President can obstruct justice under some circumstances.  Think Nixon.  Underlying crimes, burglary, conspiracy, perjury, suborning perjury, false swearing, criminal contempt, need I go on?  Nixon was up to his neck in the coverup, including plans to pay off the Watergate burglars, and to encourage witnesses to lie under oath.  Nothing to see with the Trump Witch Hunt.  Gerald Nadler now says Trump obstructed justice, and he needs to be impeached.  How, you might ask?  Well, he fired Comey.  See above.  And oh, by the way, Nadler himself called for Comey to be fired in October 2016.  It didn’t become a crime till Trump did it.  What about the “see your way clear” with Flynn?  “I hope you can see your way clear” is not an order to drop the case.  Even Comey admitted that.  But Nadler has conclusive evidence of Trump’s obstruction.  Get this.  Nadler says Trump has said 1,100 times, that the Mueller investigation is a Witch Hunt.  We’ve come to that.  In 2019 America, a person who is accused of a crime, who is denounced every day as an insane traitor, and who dares to say he’s not guilty, has committed a new crime.  Wow!  So welcome to Witch Hunt 2.0.  We will now have never-ending Congressional investigations of the President, because Gerald Nadler says so.  Nadler already has unwittingly disclosed the true game.  He announced that he needs to investigate to gather the facts necessary to impeach the President.  Translation – We’re going to impeach, but so far, we’ve got nothing.  Nadler continued his swerve into the truth, “We’ve got to convince Trump supporters you’re not trying to steal the last – uh –  you’re not trying to reverse the result of the last election.”  Stealing the last election from Donald Trump is exactly what the Dems are up to.  They will stop at nothing.  On Saturday, at CPAC, President Trump told the crowd his opponents were trying to remove him with “bullshit.”  Bravo!  I’m sure Nadler will add  “bullshit” as an article of impeachment.  Then again, that would be redundant.