Over the weekend, media networks, the true masters and rulers of America, declared Joe Biden the president-elect.  This wasn’t based on election results certified by the states, but on predictions.  But not so fast.  The apparent results show close races in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin.  Those states and the state of Michigan are now the scenes of multiple lawsuits by the Trump campaign; lawsuits alleging extensive and far-reaching election fraud.  At the end of this process, Joe Biden may finish first, with a bullet.  No, no, that’s not a threat, no need to call the FBI.  Number one with a bullet means you’ve rapidly become the best in a certain group.  And that’s how Biden became the putative president-elect.  On the night of November 3, Trump was 700,000 votes ahead in Pennsylvania, 9% ahead in Michigan, 4% ahead in Wisconsin, and leading in Arizona and Georgia.  Some states said they stopped counting votes about 2 a.m., but overnight, strange things happened.  Hundreds of thousands of mail ballots appeared, tipping the election to Biden.  In both Michigan and Wisconsin, dumps of over 100,000 votes showed 100% of them going to Biden.  This is a statistical impossibility which reeks of fraud.  Overall, Biden performed worse than Obama’s 2012 performance in most of Wisconsin, but he somehow outperformed Obama by 35% in several counties where reported turnout was up to 96%, a practical impossibility.  In Michigan, Biden somehow got 138,339 votes and Trump got none, zero, in an overnight vote-dump.  Michigan officials say it was “a typo.”  Had those votes gone the other way, I don’t think “it’s a typo” would be an acceptable explanation.  But what about “number one with a bullet?”  Ballots contain lines permitting the voter to vote for various federal, state and local offices.  A ballot on which the voter votes for only one office, leaving the rest of the ballot blank, is called a bullet vote.  The results in Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin turn on a total of about 46,000 votes.  In Pennsylvania, Biden is 48,000 votes ahead.  Here’s the funny thing.  After the polls closed on election day, hundreds of thousands of bullet votes magically appeared.  The Trump campaign has identified over 450,000 ballots that miraculously only have a vote for Joe Biden on them and no other candidate.  So far, the Trump campaign has compiled several hundred affidavits from voters and poll workers documenting incidents of election fraud, including the illegal barring of Republican representatives from the vote counting process, and eyewitness accounts of Democrat officials filling out blank ballots.  Proving Donald Trump right again, thousands of votes have been discovered to have been cast by dead people and by people who no longer live in the states where the votes were cast.  Computer voting software from Dominion Voting Systems also is a problem.  Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company in which Nancy Pelosi’s longtime chief of staff is a key executive, and Senator Diane Feinstein’s husband is a significant shareholder.  It’s used in many states, including Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia and Arizona.  Sound familiar?  Texas refused to use the software citing security concerns.  Texas was right.  In Michigan, a “software glitch” flipped several thousand votes from Trump to Biden.  In that Michigan county, the votes had to be hand-counted.  69 other Michigan counties use the same software.  Yesterday, President Trump tweeted that there is evidence that millions of Trump votes were deleted or switched to Biden by  Dominion software.  We’ll see.   Then there’s Pennsylvania, which is a special case.  The Constitution provides that each state legislature is to specify how its presidential electors are to be chosen.  This means that the state legislatures determine how their elections are to be conducted.  The Pennsylvania legislature enacted an election law that required all mail ballots to be received by the time the polls closed, or to be post-marked by November 3.  This was a sensible and reasonable law, especially since the Constitution also provides that the presidential election must be held on the same day throughout the country, that day to be set by the Congress.  That day was November 3.  The legislature’s system upheld the constitutional requirement of equal protection, in this case, guaranteeing that all voters would receive an equal opportunity to cast their votes.  For instance, if I go to the polls after closing time and want to vote, I’m turned away because it’s too late.  Those are the rules.  Likewise, if I offer a mail ballot after election day, that ballot should be rejected.  It’s too late.  Seems logical and fair, right?  Wrong, at least as far as the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is concerned.  That court undid the Pennsylvania election law; it  rewrote the law, to permit mail ballots to be received, even without a postmark, days after November 3.  If you’re thinking a court lacks the authority to do that, and maybe that doing such a thing is clearly unconstitutional, you’re not alone.  The U.S. Supreme Court was presented with that question before the election, but declined to hear it in October, being divided 4 to 4.  However, the issue is back before the Court.  The Supreme Court ordered that ballots received after election day be segregated.  But here’s the problem.  Pennsylvania election officials barred Republicans from the counting process.  What Republicans could see was Democrat officials opening mail ballots, discarding the outer envelopes, and counting the votes.  Without the envelopes, there’s no telling when the ballots  were cast.  A mail carrier from Erie, Pa., has reported that his boss instructed employees to pick up and bring him ballots that were received after Election Day.   The boss discussed backdating postmarks to make the ballots appear as though they had been collected by Nov. 3, instead of Nov. 4 or after.  Bill Barr has authorized federal prosecutors to investigate election frauds.  That’s great, but prosecuting a few people next year is cold comfort.  In the face of all this, the media maintains either that there is no evidence of fraud, or that there’s not enough evidence of fraud to make a difference.  I have to be honest.  In the end, there likely isn’t enough to change the result of the election, but that’s not the point.  Whoever wins, Americans deserve to know what happened.  We deserve to know who really won.  And any systemic (there’s a word Democrats are fond of) election fraud needs to be exposed and fixed so it never happens again.  Democrats like the detestable Chuck Schumer, and Il Duce Obama himself, have denounced Republicans for daring to call the election results into question.  Perhaps thy’ve forgotten the 2000 election that took 37 days to resolve.  Here’s the bottom line.  If you rob a bank, it’s not a defense to claim you didn’t steal enough to make a difference.  If the election count was fair, what are Democrats afraid of?