To all those “experts” who kept telling us that it was inevitable that Hillary would be the Democratic nominee and next President, “How do you like her now?”  Hillary’s favorable ratings keep going down, the fortunes of  the senile Marxist, Bernie Sanders, keep looking better, and even crazy old Joe Biden looks like a better bet than the previously inevitable President H. Clinton.  Was that President, or inmate?  Now, she’s under investigation by the FBI for violation of the Espionage Act.   General Petreus got convicted for sharing confidential information privately with his mistress.  Hillary had classified information on her private server, stored in a Colorado bathroom, and presumably available to any foreign hacker who bothered to look.  And does Hillary care?  What, me worry?  When a journalist dared to ask if she had “wiped” her server, Hillary feigned confusion and joked, “you mean like with a cloth?  And her apparent unconcern seems to be working.  A recent poll asked voters to describe Hillary in one word; the three most frequent answers were “liar,” “dishonest,” and “untrustworthy”  “Crook” also finished in the top ten.  It’s to the point that, whenever I see or hear Hillary, I think of Charles Laughton; and not just because of the physical resemblance.  In a great old movie, Witness for the Prosecution, Laughton played a barrister who cross-examined Marlena Dietrich.  Laughton recounts a litany of instances where Dietrich’s character failed to tell the truth, and concludes by asking, “Do you now confess yourself to be a continual and habitual liar?”  Good question.  What about that Hillary?  I was never worried that Hillary was unbeatable.  Now, I am worried she won’t be the nominee.