Donald’s Trump’s election victory came almost a month ago and the Left remains seriously unhinged, and on the brink of insanity.  All I can say about that is, “Oh baby!  Is this great or what?” Throughout the campaign, Hillary and her left-wing PAC henchman (henchpersons?) spent millions on advertising, trashing Trump 24 hours a day.  Her campaign alone outspent Trump more that 2 to 1.  For its part, the Media took up the cudgel and beat Trump with it day after day.  He’s unqualified.  He’s too dangerous.  He’s a sexist.  He’s a bigot.  He’s a racist.  And he’s crazy too.  On October 21, 2016, even Peggy Noonan joined the chorus, writing a column which mused that “a sane Donald Trump” could have easily won the election which she that day predicted he would lose by a wide margin.  And then Donald Trump won.  Donald Trump, who the “experts” said had no ground game and no organization, and who spent less than half the amount spent by the Democrats.  After the fact, the Democrat website Politco complained that Trump was helped out by $2 billion in free airtime on television networks.  Picture that.  The same networks that bashed Trump all day, every day actually helped get him elected.  If Politico is right, then Trump got the last laugh.  The same Media A-holes who scoffed when Trump said he’d build a wall and make the Mexicans pay for it, actually elected him President, and he made them paid for it.  So Trump won and now the Democrats are on suicide watch.  They are delusional.  Democrats cry, “There can’t be anything wrong with us, so it must be the electoral system that’s wrong.”  What did you say?  The system is rigged?  Where have I heard that before?  When Trump said it, Hillary said he was nuts.  I guess she changed her mind.  To risk repeating myself, if Democrats didn’t stand for hypocrisy, they would stand for nothing at all.  On the same day Peggy Noonan was longing for a “sane Donald Trump,” Hillary was on the attack.  She told Ohio voters that Donald Trump is threatening America’s democracy by not promising to accept the results of the presidential election.  “We know, in our country, the difference between leadership and dictatorship.  And the peaceful transition of power is something that sets us apart.”  You get that?  Real, serious leaders accept the vote of the people and only dictators stand in the way of the peaceful transition of power.  So, having lost the election, what are Hillary and her fellow (or is is filly?) leftists doing?  They’re trying to stand in the way of the peaceful transition of power.  First, they’re complaining that Hillary won the popular vote, so the Electoral College is unfair.   Forgetting, or perhaps never having been taught that the States created the federal government, and not the other way around, they fail to comprehend that the essence of the federal government is, well, federalism.  That is, that the system is designed so that even the voters in small States are important.  Trump won 306 electoral votes to Hillary’s 232.  At last count, Hillary was some 2.5 million ahead of Trump, spurring leftist outrage.  Her plurality is, of course, meaningless, but if the leftists want to play, let’s play.  The votes of just two States, California and New York, gave Hillary a plurality of almost 5 million votes, so let’s just take those States out of the mix.  Subtracting all the votes for Hillary and Trump in those States, Trump won 30 of the remaining 48 States, had a plurality of 2.4 million votes, and 306 electoral votes to 148, or 67% of the votes.  The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent the overwhelming votes of a few big States from thwarting the will of the voters in many smaller States.  It worked.  But not for Democrats.  The Party that blasted Trump as a crazy dictator is hard at work trying to convince Electors in a number of States to ignore the result of the elections in those States, and their oaths, and in some cases, the law, and elect Hillary instead.  They know it won’t work, but they need to weaken Trump before he becomes President.  Shameful hypocrites.  And then there are the recounts.  This is even wackier than the Electoral College ploy.  Jill Stein ran representing the Green Party.  She polled a whopping 1% of the vote, a little over 1 million nationwide.  Jill Stein raised only $2.5 million for her campaign in the year and a half before the election,  but in the last three weeks, she has now raised over $6.5 million from outraged leftists to finance vote recounts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan.  Trump’s victories in those States gave him 46 electoral votes and the presidency, so his victories in those States must be illegal.  Stein (and Hillary) say they have computer experts who claim the voting machines in those States can be hacked by computer hackers, who probably are Russians.  Now, mind you, there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing, and none of the voting machines are networked, so these tricky Russkies would have to gain access to each machine individually in the three States.  For leftists, of course, the absence of evidence itself is suspicious, and it proves that the scheme is all the more insidious.   No, this is not from John le Carre,’ they are serious.  So, to recap, Leftists gave $2.5 million for the election, but $6.5 million to overturn its results.  Now, that’s real leadership.  And for what?  In Pennsylvania, Stein got 48,912 votes, putting her just 2,864,029 votes behind Trump.  I read an article about the recount, written by someone from the National Constitution Center, explaining that Trump is “about 50,000 votes ahead of Hillary in Pennsylvania.”  “About” is a bit imprecise, as Trump actually is ahead by 68,000, so I hope the National Constitution Center won’t be doing that recount.  Stein finished behind Trump by 2,229,105 votes in Michigan and by 1,372,710 in Wisconsin.  So, once again, a recount for what?  For one purpose and one purpose only, to disrupt the peaceful transition of power and delegitimize the next President.  Hillary said only dictators did that.  She was right.